Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Alexander Waske vs Jonas Bjorkman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Waske vs Bjorkman analysis and find out who is favored!
Alexander Waske vs Jonas Bjorkman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Waske 1 - 1 Bjorkman
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Waske has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Bjorkman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Waske, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bjorkman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Waske has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bjorkman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Waske has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Bjorkman winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Waske has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 37/ 30), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 12/ 20). Bjorkman has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 79/ 46), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 36/ 68).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Waske winning 1 times and Bjorkman being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Waske winning 2 and Bjorkman winning 3. The last match between Waske and Bjorkman was at the Synsam Swedish Open - Bastad, 12-07-2006, First, Clay with Alexander Waske getting the victory 6-4 4-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Waske and Bjorkman have played a deciding set 1 times, with Waske winning 1 times and Bjorkman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Waske winning 0, and Bjorkman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Waske has played against opponents with an average rank of while Bjorkman has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Waske has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bjorkman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Waske has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bjorkman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
89
High
49
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
25
High
52
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
56% (259-202)
Career Total W/L
54% (438-373)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$166,750
Career Prize Money
$736,060
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Alexander Waske vs Jonas Bjorkman For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Waske VS Bjorkman
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Alexander Waske | Jonas Bjorkman |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 21 | 25 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 4 |
| DFs Total | 6 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (60/110) | 55% (48/88) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (40/60) | 69% (33/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (21/50) | 38% (15/40) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (6/16) | 31% (4/13) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (40/88) | 45% (49/110) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 4-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Alexander Waske
Player
Jonas Bjorkman
55%
(
60 of
110)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
88)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
42%
(
21 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
49 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
101
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Alexander Waske | Jonas Bjorkman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Alexander Waske Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Alexander Waske
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Waske
Player
Mikhail Elgin
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Alexander Waske
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
59%
(
59 of
100)
7
Aces
16
5
Double Faults
7
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
49 of
59)
71%
(
27 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
23 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
30 of
100)
0
Total Points Won
0
|
4-6 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(3) 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-7(2) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julien Benneteau
Player
Alexander Waske
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jonas Bjorkman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Monaco
Player
Jonas Bjorkman
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Robby Ginepri
Player
Jonas Bjorkman
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jonas Bjorkman
Player
Rajeev Ram
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonas Bjorkman
Player
Chase Buchanan
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Blake
Player
Jonas Bjorkman
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
1-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonas Bjorkman
Player
Arnaud Clement
48%
(
40 of
84)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jonas Bjorkman
Player
Thomas Johansson
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
44%
(
22 of
50)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonas Bjorkman
Player
Gary Lugassy
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Robredo
Player
Jonas Bjorkman
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Waske Vs Bjorkman Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Waske are available here and Bjorkman photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
